Did you know that without properly training the neuro system that a BBer may only using 20-30% of his muscular cababilities?
Announcement
Collapse
Did you know?
Collapse
X
-
Sorry, this question is getting asked on every board i posted this. I am far from an expert on this topic, so if any gurus want to ad, feel free.
First, let's clarify a couple terms. Structural exercises refer to lifts that could replicate every day life type movements are are geared a little more torwards mass and strength. Bench press and deadlifting are two examples. Functional lifts refer to lifts that are geared more torwards explosive movements and help to build the neuro system. These usually consist of Oly lifts. Finally, dynamic lifts refer to bascily the same movements as structural lifts, but are done in a more explosive manner with less weights.
Couple ways to integrate these into your routines. One way is to use a non-linear or linear periodization, non-linear seems to be the superio of the two, and cycle between structural, functional and dynamic weeks or every few weeks. Another way is to have certain days that focuses one specifically, another is to have one of each for each day.
The fastest proven way, as far as I know, is to lower over all volume of your workouts, increase workout frequency and use functional and structural in each day. For instance, you would do power cleans and barbell rows for one workout and that would be it. But, you would be working out EOD, sinec the CNS needs 24 hours to recover. The next day may be push presses and skull crushers.
If you would like more examples, I could probably comes up with more.
Comment
-
Alot of this info I already learned through my training program. I just didn't really know how to apply it and now that I have been researching more training styles and theories, I finally understand alot of it.
Alot of these training terms and styles are used by many people, they just didn't know the terms used to describe them.
Most of my research comes from Mel Siff, Charles Poliquin, Christian Thibaudeau and from my personal training program, in which describes the different energy systems and how they apply.
Comment
-
Oh yeah, I am not offended at all. In the last few months I have had an everlasting hunger for knowledge of training. I just can't get enough info and my knowledge on training and diet has really taken off. It is humbling to pick up a good book and read many things I never knew.
I try not to be biast either, but I have to say, everything I posted above is used by top athletes one way or another. With the addition of plyos, this is the most solid info I can give you on the subject and have more than one source on it.
Comment
-
That is why I can't stand most certification companies. they make up a lot of ambigious terms that really don't mean anything except sound neat when a trainer is impressing a client. I don't mean to offend anyone but I just can't stand the state of weight training and what passes for information.Originally posted by shortzSorry, this question is getting asked on every board i posted this. I am far from an expert on this topic, so if any gurus want to ad, feel free.
First, let's clarify a couple terms. Structural exercises refer to lifts that could replicate every day life type movements are are geared a little more torwards mass and strength. Bench press and deadlifting are two examples what part of everyday life do you lay on your back and use a barbell? or use a barbell in the deadlift postion. Functional lifts refer to lifts that are geared more torwards explosive movements and help to build the neuro system.There is a lot more evidence in my opinion that slow controlled movements produce more neuromuscular strength (if that is what you are talking about). That is why Superslow is not a very good system for hypertrophy. They had trainers that recorded enormous amounts of strength gains with little to show in way of size because of the neuromuscular conditioning they achieved. These usually consist of Oly lifts. Finally, dynamic lifts refer to bascily the same movements as structural lifts, but are done in a more explosive manner with less weights.
Couple ways to integrate these into your routines. One way is to use a non-linear or linear periodization, non-linear seems to be the superio of the two, and cycle between structural, functional and dynamic weeks or every few weeks. Another way is to have certain days that focuses one specifically, another is to have one of each for each day.
The fastest proven way, as far as I know, is to lower over all volume of your workouts, increase workout frequency and use functional and structural in each day what are you improving? I can't figure out that part? the fastest proven way...to what? . For instance, you would do power cleans and barbell rows for one workout and that would be it. But, you would be working out EOD, sinec the CNS needs 24 hours to recover. The next day may be push presses and skull crushers.
If you would like more examples, I could probably comes up with more.
Comment
-
Again I don't want to tear you down, but when a company says they will discount you for enrolling in there PT and advanced PT program at the same time it's usually not a good sign for applicable training. It does give you alot of info, but most of it is incomplete and it takes some expierence with time to sort through all the confussion. On a side not, I am one of those that dosn't belive in plyo's unless it is body resistance only.
Comment
-
there is about 10-15 good books on the site posted in my sig. Read them and then tell me what you think if your thirst is that great. :nerdnew:Originally posted by shortzOh yeah, I am not offended at all. In the last few months I have had an everlasting hunger for knowledge of training. I just can't get enough info and my knowledge on training and diet has really taken off. It is humbling to pick up a good book and read many things I never knew.
I try not to be biast either, but I have to say, everything I posted above is used by top athletes one way or anotherwhether 1 million people use it or 1 person, right is right and wrong is wrong...top athletes don't know anymore than most people beacuse they are exactly that "top athletes" they have a million people around them who are paid to tell them what to do and with superior genetics most of them achieve despite what they do. With the addition of plyos, this is the most solid info I can give you on the subject and have more than one source on it.
Comment
-
I posted mine before I read this, but it goes along the same lines.Originally posted by stonecold54That is why I can't stand most certification companies. they make up a lot of ambigious terms that really don't mean anything except sound neat when a trainer is impressing a client. I don't mean to offend anyone but I just can't stand the state of weight training and what passes for information.
Comment
-
Bending over with good form to pick something up is not an every day thing? Pushing objects are not something done in every day life? You are being silly with your analogy of "Using a barbell for everyday life".Originally posted by stonecold54That is why I can't stand most certification companies. they make up a lot of ambigious terms that really don't mean anything except sound neat when a trainer is impressing a client. I don't mean to offend anyone but I just can't stand the state of weight training and what passes for information.
Nueromuscular strength takes frequency to build it the fastest. This is why an Oly lifter does his Oly lifts numerous times per week to build up his CNS weeks before a comp. Answer this...if I were to do pullups everyday, would I get better at them faster everyday or doing them once per week? Frequency will most certainly make you better.
Can you run a 40 in 4 seconds? Do you think before training properly, all athletes can do this? If plyos and these functional systems do not work, then how are they improving their times and their ability to jump higher? They should be able to do that without them, right? Well, they tried and found that the training is not as effective as functional training and plyos.
Comment

Comment