Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

17-aa drugs- Low dose for longer VS High Dose for a short period of time..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by THE BOUNCER
    no BS in this thread. get the fuck out of here you fucking newbie. :madfu:
    I'm about to run 50mg a day for 14 weeks so I'll let you know what my bloodwork looks like when my times up - deal???

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by fog_hat1981
      I'm about to run 50mg a day for 14 weeks so I'll let you know what my bloodwork looks like when my times up - deal???
      are you really? 3 and a half months at 50mg seems excessive bro. any reason why your going to run it for so long?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by THE BOUNCER
        are you really? 3 and a half months at 50mg seems excessive bro. any reason why your going to run it for so long?
        Four shows over a 6 week period - I will only be on it for 7.5 weeks before my first show and don't/won't "want" to look worse in my last show compared to my first - I plan on just getting better with each one - I haven't really figured a way around it so I've just committed myself to coming off for at least 5 months when it's all said and done with this year...

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by THE BOUNCER
          ya but if you want to make a fare comparison, the lower dose would have to be equal to holding your finger higher off the flame. :)
          true. So maybe more like an inch off the flame for 10 sec versus right on the flame for 5 secs?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by THE BOUNCER
            Ok guys, I want all your opinions on this.

            I was thinking about this today at the gym.

            Which of these options would be worse on the liver.

            Running a 17-aa drug such as Winstrol for 6 weeks at 50mgs a day, Or running Winstrol for 12 weeks at 25mgs a day.

            My thinking is that the higher dose for a shorter period would actually put more strain on the liver because of the shock of the high dose. I think running a lower dose (half) for twice as long would actually be better.

            What do you guys think?
            makes perfect logic to me,,,but i think bloodwork would be only way to show for sure.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Shibby
              true. So maybe more like an inch off the flame for 10 sec versus right on the flame for 5 secs?
              both would burn like a bitch. :D

              Comment


              • #22
                actually I just learned today, concerning antibiotics and hepatotoxicity that it is less toxic to take a higher single dose than to spread them apart, not sure if it applys to aas as well...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by al the chemist
                  actually I just learned today, concerning antibiotics and hepatotoxicity that it is less toxic to take a higher single dose than to spread them apart, not sure if it applys to aas as well...
                  can you go into more detail. why is it more toxic? thanks

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Didn't read the whole thread so you'll have to forgive my laziness during the Super Bowl, but I hate to say this....The only way to find out is with multiple test patients doing blood work on the 2 options.

                    Obviously some people will handle the 17-AA's better than others so unless you have a few people the results won't be too accurate. I'm pretty curious myself though...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X