Originally posted by BEAST
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
HGH LABZ For the win again
Collapse
X
-
this brings up a good point. anyone could say anything. people could say they tested high on one brand and low on another and people would just have to believe it. even with a paper. people could post high scores on seros while saying they tested jins or ansomone because they wanted to make a particular brand look good. on the flip side people could get blood work without being on gh at all and then post the paper with low igf scores saying "i was running 10iu a day of ansomone" in the hopes of getting a refund while keeping the gh. it really just comes down to taking each other's word. even with a paper it's not 100% proof.
-
-
Rocket made a point about the paper. I'm questioning testing as a whole with paper or without paper. It can easily be manipulated both by the source and the end user. It comes down to nothing more than what someone says they tested. That's hardly scientific. Nobody in the world would trust a drug study where all the data comes from participants that say they used a particular drug at a specific dose for a specific time frame. These things need to be strictly monitored in a controlled setting. Otherwise it's open to manipulation, error etc...Originally posted by Chadd77 View PostYeah because Rocket didn't say that already 100 times. lol
Comment
-
hers is why I jump on some of you I said this same thing 5000times but yet look at the dick riders liking bouncers post and not any of the time s I say it. you guys are all fucking sheep blind to the real world dont be mad when I open your eyes. you lil fags hate so much you dont even see my posts. Ive never led you guys wrong but all the sudden I am some dirt bag ? you take up with a scammer selling ahit GH over a member that has helped everyone of you more than once but na Im the bad guy. lolOriginally posted by Bouncer View Postthis brings up a good point. anyone could say anything. people could say they tested high on one brand and low on another and people would just have to believe it. even with a paper. people could post high scores on seros while saying they tested jins or ansomone because they wanted to make a particular brand look good. on the flip side people could get blood work without being on gh at all and then post the paper with low igf scores saying "i was running 10iu a day of ansomone" in the hopes of getting a refund while keeping the gh. it really just comes down to taking each other's word. even with a paper it's not 100% proof.
Comment
-
lol boy your a smart one what the fiuck I been yelling this whole time?Originally posted by Bouncer View PostRocket made a point about the paper. I'm questioning testing as a whole with paper or without paper. It can easily be manipulated both by the source and the end user. It comes down to nothing more than what someone says they tested. That's hardly scientific. Nobody in the world would trust a drug study where all the data comes from participants that say they used a particular drug at a specific dose for a specific time frame. These things need to be strictly monitored in a controlled setting. Otherwise it's open to manipulation, error etc...
Comment
-
they may have run into too many issues shipping wise from russia. probably figured it wasn't worth the cost. i don't think the US had a very good relationship with Russia now in terms of ease of shipping and cost etc..Originally posted by skoonz View PostWhatever happened to HGH labz, purchased from them once about 1.5 years ago now they are gone?
Comment

Comment