Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

HGH LABZ For the win again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by BEAST View Post
    Wow this shit was good! :thumup:
    Seriously Rado, like rocket said, what does the paper prove? He could've taken some serostim and get test it and have awesome report and you would never know.
    So give it a break brah. :D
    this brings up a good point. anyone could say anything. people could say they tested high on one brand and low on another and people would just have to believe it. even with a paper. people could post high scores on seros while saying they tested jins or ansomone because they wanted to make a particular brand look good. on the flip side people could get blood work without being on gh at all and then post the paper with low igf scores saying "i was running 10iu a day of ansomone" in the hopes of getting a refund while keeping the gh. it really just comes down to taking each other's word. even with a paper it's not 100% proof.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by BEAST View Post
      Wow this shit was good! :thumup:
      Seriously Rado, like rocket said, what does the paper prove? He could've taken some serostim and get test it and have awesome report and you would never know.
      So give it a break brah. :D
      Looking WIDE brah :thumup:

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by rado View Post
        Looking WIDE brah :thumup:
        Thank you. I finally got myass to the gym. :rofl:

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
          this brings up a good point.
          Yeah because Rocket didn't say that already 100 times. lol

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
            Yeah because Rocket didn't say that already 100 times. lol
            Rocket made a point about the paper. I'm questioning testing as a whole with paper or without paper. It can easily be manipulated both by the source and the end user. It comes down to nothing more than what someone says they tested. That's hardly scientific. Nobody in the world would trust a drug study where all the data comes from participants that say they used a particular drug at a specific dose for a specific time frame. These things need to be strictly monitored in a controlled setting. Otherwise it's open to manipulation, error etc...

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
              this brings up a good point. anyone could say anything. people could say they tested high on one brand and low on another and people would just have to believe it. even with a paper. people could post high scores on seros while saying they tested jins or ansomone because they wanted to make a particular brand look good. on the flip side people could get blood work without being on gh at all and then post the paper with low igf scores saying "i was running 10iu a day of ansomone" in the hopes of getting a refund while keeping the gh. it really just comes down to taking each other's word. even with a paper it's not 100% proof.
              hers is why I jump on some of you I said this same thing 5000times but yet look at the dick riders liking bouncers post and not any of the time s I say it. you guys are all fucking sheep blind to the real world dont be mad when I open your eyes. you lil fags hate so much you dont even see my posts. Ive never led you guys wrong but all the sudden I am some dirt bag ? you take up with a scammer selling ahit GH over a member that has helped everyone of you more than once but na Im the bad guy. lol

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                Rocket made a point about the paper. I'm questioning testing as a whole with paper or without paper. It can easily be manipulated both by the source and the end user. It comes down to nothing more than what someone says they tested. That's hardly scientific. Nobody in the world would trust a drug study where all the data comes from participants that say they used a particular drug at a specific dose for a specific time frame. These things need to be strictly monitored in a controlled setting. Otherwise it's open to manipulation, error etc...
                lol boy your a smart one what the fiuck I been yelling this whole time?

                Comment


                • #98
                  Whatever happened to HGH labz, purchased from them once about 1.5 years ago now they are gone?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by skoonz View Post
                    Whatever happened to HGH labz, purchased from them once about 1.5 years ago now they are gone?
                    they may have run into too many issues shipping wise from russia. probably figured it wasn't worth the cost. i don't think the US had a very good relationship with Russia now in terms of ease of shipping and cost etc..

                    Comment


                    • Make sense, thanks man.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X