I was trying to find info on site Injections with HGH to see if it helps grow the area where injected into like lagging body parts. Instead I came across this.
Basically HGH administered subcutaneously is better absorbed than IM.
"RESULTS:*Following the injection serum GH had risen by 1 hour and peaked by 3-6 hours. The peak GH and growth hormone area under the curve were significantly higher after injection in the abdomen compared with the thigh (GH peak (mean +/- SEM) 103 +/- 20 vs 41 +/- 8 mU/l, P = 0.002 and GH area 528 +/- 86 vs 239 +/- 34 mU/l h, P = 0.003 respectively). Serum insulin-like growth factor I at 12 and at 24 hours showed a significant rise from the baseline level, but no significant difference was observed between the two injection sites. No significant difference in plasma insulin, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids or glycerol was observed between the two methods of injection"
Https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1814654/
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
Basically HGH administered subcutaneously is better absorbed than IM.
"RESULTS:*Following the injection serum GH had risen by 1 hour and peaked by 3-6 hours. The peak GH and growth hormone area under the curve were significantly higher after injection in the abdomen compared with the thigh (GH peak (mean +/- SEM) 103 +/- 20 vs 41 +/- 8 mU/l, P = 0.002 and GH area 528 +/- 86 vs 239 +/- 34 mU/l h, P = 0.003 respectively). Serum insulin-like growth factor I at 12 and at 24 hours showed a significant rise from the baseline level, but no significant difference was observed between the two injection sites. No significant difference in plasma insulin, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids or glycerol was observed between the two methods of injection"
Https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1814654/
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
Comment