Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Paramount dumps Tom Cruise...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paramount dumps Tom Cruise...

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movi....ap/index.html

    LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- The latest high-profile Hollywood breakup is between a movie star and a top studio.

    Sumner Redstone, whose company owns Paramount Pictures, said the studio would sever its 14-year relationship with Cruise's film production company because "his recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount."

    "As much as we like him personally," the Viacom Inc. chairman told The Wall Street Journal, "we thought it was wrong to renew his deal."

    Cruise's partner, Paula Wagner, said negotiations on a new contract simply fizzled.

    The deal in recent years paid Cruise and Wagner up to $10 million a year to develop films and operate an office on the Paramount lot, the Journal said Wednesday. It was reported that Cruise and the studio had been discussing a less lucrative deal.

    The studio had offered the pair $2 million a year, plus a $500,000 discretionary fund during each of the next two years, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday. It cited sources with knowledge of the talks who didn't want to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.

    In the past year or so, the usually guarded actor came under intense scrutiny after he jumped up and down on Oprah Winfrey's couch while proclaiming his love for Katie Holmes, openly advocated Scientology, and criticized Brooke Shields for taking prescription drugs to treat postpartum depression. The religion founded by science-fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard opposes psychiatry and its medication.

    Redstone estimated that Cruise's off-screen behavior cost his latest movie, "Mission: Impossible III," $100 million to $150 million in ticket sales, even as he praised the film as "the best of the three movies" in the action series.

    "It's nothing to do with his acting ability, he's a terrific actor," Redstone said. "But we don't think that someone who effectuates creative suicide and costs the company revenue should be on the lot."

    Wagner told The Associated Press that agents for Cruise/Wagner Productions stopped negotiating with Paramount over a week ago and have since secured independent financing, effectively taking any contract-renewal deal off the table.

    "For some reason, Paramount has chosen to negotiate in the press," Wagner said, calling Redstone's announcement "surprising."

    "It's not really the most businesslike approach," she said. "We've had virtually no dealings with Mr. Redstone."

    Each of the actor's last seven films have generated more than $100 million. And the collaboration between Paramount and Cruise/Wagner Productions, based on the Paramount lot since 1992, has produced $2.5 billion worth of business, Wagner said.

    Wagner said she and Cruise had been considering independent financing for their company "for a long time." She said the company has already obtained commitments from two hedge funds, whose names would be announced soon.

    "For us, this is a very new and exciting direction. We look forward to working with all the studios."

  • #2
    Wow - Sumner is a major movie mogul - he owns everything it seems....

    Comment


    • #3
      Sumner owns Viacom I think, which has a piece in just about every media and entertainment outlet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yep, he sure does....

        He owns a big video game company too - and MTV

        Comment


        • #5
          Finally!

          Comment


          • #6
            http://cruisegetswet.ytmnd.com/

            - good fuking prick :slap:

            Comment


            • #7
              I wonder how many of the other crazy cult people (ie Scientologists) will take a hit in the future if they get too outspoken about L. Ron's bullshit?

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't know if this is true or not but I remember hearing or reading somewhere that L. Ron Hubbard developed scientology as a joke to prove how gullible people really were at stuff like religious beliefs. It was to be his lasting legacy to mankind- a stark portrayal of our willingness to believe in even the most unlikely crap. The joke was that people would donate all sorts of money to such a "religion" that will eventually break them financially in the process. So, the more successful and fanatical one is in support of scientology, the more financial and emotional pain that person will eventually experience as a result of their own ignorance- or pompousness. Ironic, huh?

                Comment


                • #9
                  I actually feel sorry for people like Tom Cruise. I think it's sad that he can't see how diluted he has become. He's been sucked in by this cult and now they've got him believing everything they want him to. They've just been using him as their billboard and he lets them. I wonder if his marriage to Nicole Kidman was just a scheme they cooked up to place scientology in the public eye. Same thing with Katie Holmes. Every picture I see of them now, they look like they have a gun pressed into their side or something. It's like they're being forced to smile and make it look like they're happy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You can't expect Tom Cruise to be more on the side of norm. He has been in the spotlight for 20 years. What is there for him to do that he hasn't or can't already.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Its so great that this has happened. His job 2 summers ago was to promote the movie that he was working on to Oprah, to the Today show... instead he goes and promotes his odd scientology views to the world, jumps on a couch because he's so in love, tells matt lauer he know more about kids and ritalin - when lauer has a son who has ADD and he has seen first hand his child on ritalin and off ----which then overshadows the movie he was supposed to promote ( which was war of the worlds I think).

                      Thank you Paramount for holding him accountable for all that.

                      Just think if you did something like that at your job, you'd be fired!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dreamgirl
                        Its so great that this has happened. His job 2 summers ago was to promote the movie that he was working on to Oprah, to the Today show... instead he goes and promotes his odd scientology views to the world, jumps on a couch because he's so in love, tells matt lauer he know more about kids and ritalin - when lauer has a son who has ADD and he has seen first hand his child on ritalin and off ----which then overshadows the movie he was supposed to promote ( which was war of the worlds I think).

                        Thank you Paramount for holding him accountable for all that.

                        Just think if you did something like that at your job, you'd be fired!
                        ADD?? Now that is some made up shit. Nothing like pumping your kids full of amphetamine salts to start them on a life of good health.
                        Last edited by Turbo3000; 08-25-06, 09:21 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I'm really surprised at the comments on here - I am all for Tom Cruise's "yuppie" ass being put in his place for his eccentric behavior - BUT - all of this talk about "cults" etc really seems ignorant IMO...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by fog_hat1981
                            all of this talk about "cults" etc really seems ignorant IMO...
                            Sorry, but that's just not true. Read up a bit on scientology and see for yourself. They're a bunch of wackos.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by babyblues
                              Sorry, but that's just not true. Read up a bit on scientology and see for yourself. They're a bunch of wackos.

                              It dosn't make sense to say something not true, by following it up with you opinion.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X