Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Am I the only one who thinks LSU is grossly overrated?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Grnmachine this isnt a debate its facts.Oh BTW how many national titles does the big east own? Miami put a few there and were at the top of college football all the 80s and 90s.So save those unenformed statements.Rutgers is the best usf will see?UWV is better than the rutgers,who lost to ACC bottom dweller Maryland.USFs schedual is cupcake,your right LSUs is cupcake too it appears this season.Reminds me of the BIG 10 last season before the bowl games exposed them.Im sorry the SEC is down big time.It was once the super conference but not anymore.You said its even more balanced since SC and kentucky are becoming competitive.I know for fact SC is worse than last season,no syvelle Newton and no sidney Rice,an offense that doesnt exist.But yes they are serious competitors this season for sure,i agree.The ACC is better this season than the SEC. BC will own lsu and UFL,Clemson will slam most of your teams.FLS already embarressed Alababma.LSU did beat VA tech,whos program is in trouble and tailspinning down as we speak.From top to bottom the ACC is better.Lets just wait and see,OK buddy :D

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Gods Son
      Miami put a few there and were at the top of college football all the 80s and 90s.So save those unenformed statements.
      Who the hell is talking about Miami in the 80's and 90's? Did anybody mention Geno Toretta.......

      Originally posted by Gods Son
      Rutgers is the best usf will see?UWV is better than the rutgers,who lost to ACC bottom dweller Maryland.
      I said Rutgers is the best team they have left to see. Obviously they have already played West Virginia. Learn how to fucking read numb-nuts!

      Originally posted by Gods Son
      I know for fact SC is worse than last season,no syvelle Newton and no sidney Rice,an offense that doesnt exist.
      SC is currently ranked 59 in total offense. They finished last year ranked 44. Doesn't appear to be non-existent. Looks just slightly off from last year and the year is not over.

      Originally posted by Gods Son
      The ACC is better this season than the SEC.
      The ACC has 3 teams in the top 25(BC-7,VaTech-15,Clemson-22). The SEC has 5 teams in the top 12 (LSU-1,Kentucky-8,UF-9,SC-11,UGA-12).

      Should I keep proving your dumb-ass wrong or do you feel like continuing?

      Comment


      • #18
        The part about miami was meant for yellowjacket.SC is ranked 59th LOL. Thats the whole point of this post,the ratings are way off. I live right here in SC.Tiger and Gamecock football is big here.All Gamecock fans know there team is down,the offense sux,spurrior doesnt know who hes going to play at qb from week to week.Their is no QB controversy but a lack of QB.They lost their only all_american for the season.Louisiana Lafayette and all black SC st. are where those offense numbers came from.But they may win the SEC east.Yipppeee what a thrill,especially when the Conferense is at it worst in years.As far as the ACC and SEC the ACC isnt overrated.3 of the rated SEC teams will lose this weekend starting tonight as a matter of fact.And guess what the loser of LSU and florida will hardly fall at all in the poll,because of alumni voters.That is a known fact the SEC and Big 10 have the majority of alumni voting.Why do you think BC has won at least 9 games the last 10 yrs and not had a desent rating?Usc falls in the ratings because of a close conference win,while wisconcin slips by unlv then beats The Citadel(a div 2 version of army lol) by a touchdown.While moving up the poll all the while.YES alumni voting is why.Oh yeah Kentucky is about to go on a 4 or 5 game losing streak.watch and see.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by rado
          OMG...:laughnew:
          He owned me Rado,I guess i better give him a $1000 bill.

          Comment


          • #20
            Gods Son, we're both obviously a little biased, so we'll leave it at that. But the reason why 3 of the ranked SEC teams will lose is because in SEC play, the majority of the teams stay ranked. Does that not signify conference strength? Of course a ranked team will lose tonight, they're both ranked. If SC wins tonight, UK will not drop far, because they lost to the #11 team in the country. It's not like they lost to an average team....

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by grnmchn
              Gods Son, we're both obviously a little biased, so we'll leave it at that. But the reason why 3 of the ranked SEC teams will lose is because in SEC play, the majority of the teams stay ranked. Does that not signify conference strength? Of course a ranked team will lose tonight, they're both ranked. If SC wins tonight, UK will not drop far, because they lost to the #11 team in the country. It's not like they lost to an average team....
              Agreed

              Comment


              • #22
                FSU hasn't beaten UF since 2003 (Ron Zook's last year).

                GT hasn't beaten UGA in what, 6, 7 years (I lost count).

                Clemson lost to SC and UK last year (both bottom dwellers in the East at the end of the year)

                WF did beat Ole Miss last year, but they lost to Vandy in '05.

                VT, the second highest ranked ACC team, got destroyed by LSU and beat by UGA in their bowl game last year (UGA lost to both Vandy and UK last year).

                BC has one of the weakest schedules I've ever seen (UMass, Army, Bowling Green, ND).

                Vandy has a match up with WF at the end of the year... I'm predicting Vandy to win if they can find a quarterback to play consistent.

                FSU beat UA this year (UA beat Houston by 6 at home, they are still a very inconsistent team), but I would hardly call a 21-14 win "embarrassing" them.

                How is VT tailspinning??? They just destroyed the same GT team that beat Clemson last week.

                Clemson beat SC in 05.

                Right now... ACC has three ranked teams (#3 BC, #11 VT, #19 UVA)
                SEC has seven (#4 LSU, #6 SC, #7 UK, #15 UF, #17 AU, #20 UGA, #21 UT)

                Now take off those Orange colored glasses. The ACC (Almost Competitive Conference) hasn't been strong in the past 4 or 5 years (last time both Miami and FSU were good), and I see nothing to change that this year.
                Last edited by SloppyJo; 10-15-07, 02:36 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by SloppyJo

                  Right now... ACC has three ranked teams (#3 BC, #11 VT, #19 UVA)

                  I agree w/ your entire post... and if these 3 teams played in the SEC.... Im sure only 1 would be ranked, and it wouldnt be #3.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    The SEC only stands to get better in the next year or two (and they're already the best damn conference there is) - almost every team is either missing key players due to injuries or they're facing virtually ALL freshman/sophomore starting lineups...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Gods Son
                      Miami put a few there and were at the top of college football all the 80s and 90s.
                      True, but how much pride can you take in that when the titles were won by ex-cons who were in their mid to late 20's? :laughnew:

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X