Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Rado got a 2010 C63 AMG

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Post
    Car handels fine. straight line its fucking crazy. You need to ask your friend to drive it you will see. he might not know how to drive or drive that car? True its not super car but it aint shit either.
    And sorry a C class is a chicks car even the AMG version for a few Gs more he could of got a CLK black series That is a real track car and limited number built.
    C63 AMG a chick car? Doubtful. It takes turns and all but because the way the weight distribution is set up, it's not as effective. The tail kick out easily if not careful. You definitely notice the car's suspension getting uneven around turns above 70mph.

    Comment


    • #17
      I just want to point out it wil never need to handle well since rado will be behind the wheel. :D

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by dna9488 View Post
        C63 AMG a chick car? Doubtful. It takes turns and all but because the way the weight distribution is set up, it's not as effective. The tail kick out easily if not careful. You definitely notice the car's suspension getting uneven around turns above 70mph.
        LOL, I know I just see lil cars as chick cars same with the M3. both bad ass cars but I would never buy one. M5 yes E63 yes

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Post
          LOL, I know I just see lil cars as chick cars same with the M3. both bad ass cars but I would never buy one. M5 yes E63 yes
          man you hate on M3 , just rip my heart out homey.

          Comment


          • #20
            LOL I actually love the M3 I just would never buy it as I see it as a chick car only due to its size nothing else. he is some shit I found about the C63

            Redesigned front axle with 35 mm wider track

            The C 63 AMG owes its outstanding handling dynamics to the AMG sports suspension and an all-new three-link front axle design. The stiff configuration of the springs and gas-pressure shock absorbers ensures optimal road contact and low body movements when negotiating serpentine bends at speed. The new front axle has a 35 mm wider track – visible by the more widely flared wheel arches – and therefore ensures lower dynamic wheel loads when cornering. A number of features make for substantially more stability and precision in all driving situations: the redesigned wheel location at the front axle is 100 per cent more rigid, leading to a considerable improvement in steering precision. Another benefit makes itself felt when braking, as the new wheel location ensures an immediate response even under high dynamic stresses.

            In combination with completely newly configured elasto-kinematics, the new wheel location provides greatly improved lateral dynamics and allows the driver of the C 63 AMG to benefit from significantly higher cornering speeds. A larger torsion bar stabiliser, new head bearings and dampers with rebound buffer springs further enhance this stability and precision. Steering feedback is also improved by the new kinematics. The speed-sensitive AMG sports steering has a ratio of 13.5:1, but feels more direct as a result of moving what is termed the instant centre of motion at the front axle. A more rigid Hardy disc in the steering column, as well as modified steering characteristics, make a further contribution to increased precision.

            The multi-link independent rear suspension has also been thoroughly re-engineered, with a 12 mm wider track and more camber leading to improved cornering performance. Reinforced drive shafts and drive joints increase fatigue strength and round off the improvements to the rear suspension of the C 63 AMG.

            The completely newly developed AMG sports suspension combines outstanding handling dynamics with the long-distance comfort to be expected of a Mercedes – which also means that the C 63 AMG has the characteristic virtues of a genuine AMG.

            Comment


            • #21
              I've been reading for 7 hours after class - fucking cliffnote that shit bro i dont work for nasa and shibby wont give me his pills.

              Comment


              • #22
                Mad hate in this thread.

                DNA, the c63 Amg takes the corners about as well as any sedan. By far the best choice Rado has ever made on a car.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by ROCKETW19 View Post
                  LOL, I know I just see lil cars as chick cars same with the M3. both bad ass cars but I would never buy one. M5 yes E63 yes
                  M3 a chick car? Kill yourself!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by THE BOUNCER View Post
                    M3 a chick car? Kill yourself!
                    that's two things i have to agree with you today. stop being a poser and bring back the e thug i know. :hibb::weights:

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Make that 3, I just agreed with you in the other thread. Gay. Fuck off!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        you go see my shrink today ? Geico drill sargent lmao , get your ass in gear jack wagon ? Thinkin straight i see. :D

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by dna9488 View Post
                          Wasn't Rado pressed about the 2011 RX-8?

                          Instead he gets a 515hp Benz that is only good in a straight line. Shit can't turn for the life of the car.
                          It's faster then the RS4. :D

                          YouTube - BMW M3 vs Mercedes C63 AMG vs Audi RS4 in Spain - Top Gear - BBC

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            So me and rado were arguing about which would be faster around the track, C63 AMG or the 370?

                            Before you all jump on my ass with the "370 this and 370 that" just realize that the c63 0-60 time is only .2 seconds quicker then the 370. 370 is much lighter.

                            my argument is that i could go in and out of the corners faster and he would be a bit faster in the straights.

                            a lighter sports car VS a powerful sedan. whou would have the faster time around the track?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I hope you both crash in corner one.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by decadecadeca View Post
                                I hope you both crash in corner one.
                                Don't worry they will. Neither one those idiots will lift off before the corner because of the fear of the other guy going in to the turn first. :retard::rofl:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X