Originally posted by ROCKETW19
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Rado got a 2010 C63 AMG
Collapse
X
-
C63 AMG a chick car? Doubtful. It takes turns and all but because the way the weight distribution is set up, it's not as effective. The tail kick out easily if not careful. You definitely notice the car's suspension getting uneven around turns above 70mph.
-
LOL, I know I just see lil cars as chick cars same with the M3. both bad ass cars but I would never buy one. M5 yes E63 yesOriginally posted by dna9488 View PostC63 AMG a chick car? Doubtful. It takes turns and all but because the way the weight distribution is set up, it's not as effective. The tail kick out easily if not careful. You definitely notice the car's suspension getting uneven around turns above 70mph.
Comment
-
LOL I actually love the M3 I just would never buy it as I see it as a chick car only due to its size nothing else. he is some shit I found about the C63
Redesigned front axle with 35 mm wider track
The C 63 AMG owes its outstanding handling dynamics to the AMG sports suspension and an all-new three-link front axle design. The stiff configuration of the springs and gas-pressure shock absorbers ensures optimal road contact and low body movements when negotiating serpentine bends at speed. The new front axle has a 35 mm wider track – visible by the more widely flared wheel arches – and therefore ensures lower dynamic wheel loads when cornering. A number of features make for substantially more stability and precision in all driving situations: the redesigned wheel location at the front axle is 100 per cent more rigid, leading to a considerable improvement in steering precision. Another benefit makes itself felt when braking, as the new wheel location ensures an immediate response even under high dynamic stresses.
In combination with completely newly configured elasto-kinematics, the new wheel location provides greatly improved lateral dynamics and allows the driver of the C 63 AMG to benefit from significantly higher cornering speeds. A larger torsion bar stabiliser, new head bearings and dampers with rebound buffer springs further enhance this stability and precision. Steering feedback is also improved by the new kinematics. The speed-sensitive AMG sports steering has a ratio of 13.5:1, but feels more direct as a result of moving what is termed the instant centre of motion at the front axle. A more rigid Hardy disc in the steering column, as well as modified steering characteristics, make a further contribution to increased precision.
The multi-link independent rear suspension has also been thoroughly re-engineered, with a 12 mm wider track and more camber leading to improved cornering performance. Reinforced drive shafts and drive joints increase fatigue strength and round off the improvements to the rear suspension of the C 63 AMG.
The completely newly developed AMG sports suspension combines outstanding handling dynamics with the long-distance comfort to be expected of a Mercedes – which also means that the C 63 AMG has the characteristic virtues of a genuine AMG.
Comment
-
It's faster then the RS4. :DOriginally posted by dna9488 View PostWasn't Rado pressed about the 2011 RX-8?
Instead he gets a 515hp Benz that is only good in a straight line. Shit can't turn for the life of the car.
YouTube - BMW M3 vs Mercedes C63 AMG vs Audi RS4 in Spain - Top Gear - BBC
Comment
-
So me and rado were arguing about which would be faster around the track, C63 AMG or the 370?
Before you all jump on my ass with the "370 this and 370 that" just realize that the c63 0-60 time is only .2 seconds quicker then the 370. 370 is much lighter.
my argument is that i could go in and out of the corners faster and he would be a bit faster in the straights.
a lighter sports car VS a powerful sedan. whou would have the faster time around the track?
Comment

Comment