Announcement
Collapse
Gotta love restricted gun ownership
Collapse
X
-
Especially the idiocy of it being piecemeal and varying state by state. Its like filling a bathe with several holes up to the top with water, then saying repairs clearly don't work because you only filled a couple holes and its still leaking.
Utterly, Utterly retarded
-
At this rate the south side will be empty. good news for everyone really. once the monkey's are gone we can turn it into a useful part of Chicago. If I was the mayor I would give every black in south side a gun and bullets and say "have at it, kill your fellow monkey!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr incredible View PostEspecially the idiocy of it being piecemeal and varying state by state. Its like filling a bathe with several holes up to the top with water, then saying repairs clearly don't work because you only filled a couple holes and its still leaking.
Utterly, Utterly retarded
Comment
-
Thats when we were all joking around. My picture of you is becoming clearer now.
I've also said that if there were no guns at all, thete woud be less total deaths. I was making a point pertinent to the argument or the context of the flow of conversation.
My stance is that with tight gun control, things would be alot better.
You wpuld stil have the odd incident
Also to be clear, if I lived in texas I believe I would feel compelled to own a firearm
Comment
-
Very fair question.Originally posted by Chadd77 View PostMr I, what does "tight gun control" mean?
No one with mental health issues may own
No one with history of violence
Appeals may be heard
Otherwise, if u can prove u hunt, rifle allowed only on license, ic you shot birds or rabbits a shotgun is allowed but not multi shot just SbS UO etc.
no licenses to carry sidearm except farmers and forces
I appreciate thus coulf potentiate a situation whete someone has both shotty and rifle which is where mental health is so important.
Frankly whatever I pit forward as a brit will get shat on by u guys because of your fundamental holding onto your "right" to bear arms. I genuinely empathise on this point but feel if you could only let it go and envisage the futute without prejudice you would agree
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr incredible View PostVery fair question.
No one with mental health issues may own
No one with history of violence
Appeals may be heard
Otherwise, if u can prove u hunt, rifle allowed only on license, ic you shot birds or rabbits a shotgun is allowed but not multi shot just SbS UO etc.
no licenses to carry sidearm except farmers and forces
I appreciate thus coulf potentiate a situation whete someone has both shotty and rifle which is where mental health is so important.
Frankly whatever I pit forward as a brit will get shat on by u guys because of your fundamental holding onto your "right" to bear arms. I genuinely empathise on this point but feel if you could only let it go and envisage the futute without prejudice you would agree
Comment
-
There is a weakness in that protocol I admit as it can only work retrospective I.e. if someone has "known" issues.Originally posted by Chadd77 View Postlol
Mr I, how do you prove someone has a mental illness? I agree with you but proving that is near impossible.
Over here, in order to get a license, (ive had both firearns and shotty licenses previousely) the police, before issuing one, require written statement from your dictor to say you have no history of mental illness
Comment

Comment