Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

A fine day indeed for Internet in America!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turbo3000
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    Lets do that. Lets agree to the current average speed and price in America first though.

    I would say the AVERAGE is 25mbps for $50-$60 per month for internet. Would you agree?

    This of course all disregards that in 3 years the Internet would have been a very different place if net neutrality had not been won.

    I personally see this as Civil war #2. We have the confederate who is so blinded by anything the Union does as bad that you can't see past your ass. Even though you know the fundamental rights in which you fight involve wickedness. Slaves in this case = a free internet.

    Can't be a coincidence that you are from Atlanta.. the heart of the Confederacy.. You can call me Ulysses S Grant you dumb southern cunt!

    You always seem pretty intelligent when talking about history. Too bad your Civil war knowledge is approaching zero.

    Go read up on VOIP customers. Check out prices before it was classified a telecom by the Government and check out prices now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    Lets do that. Lets agree to the current average speed and price in America first though.

    I would say the AVERAGE is 25mbps for $50-$60 per month for internet. Would you agree?

    This of course all disregards that in 3 years the Internet would have been a very different place if net neutrality had not been won.

    I personally see this as Civil war #2. We have the confederate who is so blinded by anything the Union does as bad that you can't see past your ass. Even though you know the fundamental rights in which you fight involve wickedness. Slaves in this case = a free internet.

    Can't be a coincidence that you are from Atlanta.. the heart of the Confederacy.. You can call me Ulysses S Grant you dumb southern cunt!

    Leave a comment:


  • Turbo3000
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    The alternative in this situation was far worse. I'm sorry but you clearly don't understand the issue.

    Sometimes government intervention is a good thing when it comes to corporate greed. You are so blinded by anything that involves the Gorverment that you automatically dismiss the cause regardless of intent.

    "This is no more a plan to regulate the internet than the first amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same concept: openness, expression, and an absence of gatekeepers telling people what they can do, where they can go and what they can think."

    Get ready for higher prices. Let's bump it in 3 years and see who knew what they were talking about.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    Originally posted by Turbo3000 View Post
    The government is coming to save us. I'm so excited.

    I can't wait for all the taxes and fees(more taxes) to be added to my monthly bill.

    Government isn't the answer.
    The alternative in this situation was far worse. I'm sorry but you clearly don't understand the issue.

    Sometimes government intervention is a good thing when it comes to corporate greed. You are so blinded by anything that involves the Gorverment that you automatically dismiss the cause regardless of intent.

    "This is no more a plan to regulate the internet than the first amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same concept: openness, expression, and an absence of gatekeepers telling people what they can do, where they can go and what they can think."

    Leave a comment:


  • Turbo3000
    replied
    The government is coming to save us. I'm so excited.

    I can't wait for all the taxes and fees(more taxes) to be added to my monthly bill.

    Government isn't the answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    In very simple terms it allows the internet to stay the way it has always been.

    ISP's like Verizon or ATT wanted to divide the internet into fast lane and slow lane. The big companies who can pay like Netflix, amazon, Google etc would get full speed and all the smaller sites on the web like this shithole site would be left on route 66.

    If such a plan were put in place nothing would be able to grow online. It would be a place where only those who pay can be seen. Imagine if that rule had been in place years ago when Google or amazon were just starting out. The ISP plan would have killed innovation on the internet and have been nothing more then a corporate controlled shit hole. It would literally have been the death of the internet. A place that doesn't give startups a voice.
    good breakdown B:thumb:

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr I
    replied
    Good

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    This is perfect.

    In response to some idiot saying this is government regulation of the internet.

    "This is no more a plan to regulate the internet than the first amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same concept: openness, expression, and an absence of gatekeepers telling people what they can do, where they can go and what they can think."

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrumhalf
    replied
    For all their pro business malarkey that they spout, the GOP turds voted against it. In big data's pockets :disagree:

    Leave a comment:


  • TKD
    replied
    See this seems like one of those logical things that the public wants. A win for the public instead of the 1%.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    On top of that, the ISP's now fall under much stricter rules. Anyone who has tried to cancel their cable service knows just how horrible they can be.

    This will lead to better service and better pricing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    In very simple terms it allows the internet to stay the way it has always been.

    ISP's like Verizon or ATT wanted to divide the internet into fast lane and slow lane. The big companies who can pay like Netflix, amazon, Google etc would get full speed and all the smaller sites on the web like this shithole site would be left on route 66.

    If such a plan were put in place nothing would be able to grow online. It would be a place where only those who pay can be seen. Imagine if that rule had been in place years ago when Google or amazon were just starting out. The ISP plan would have killed innovation on the internet and have been nothing more then a corporate controlled shit hole. It would literally have been the death of the internet. A place that doesn't give startups a voice.

    Leave a comment:


  • TKD
    replied
    Can you summarize what this means? I didn't know if this before and not sure I understand what it's saying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    started a topic A fine day indeed for Internet in America!

    A fine day indeed for Internet in America!

    FCC approves net neutrality rules, reclassifies broadband as a utility
Working...
X