Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Probably the worst travesty this century committed by state

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    You are absolutely being contradictory. If you want to play spin zone because I've backed you into a corner that's up to you.
    :rofl::rofl::rofl:

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    You are absolutely being contradictory. If you want to play spin zone because I've backed you into a corner that's up to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Nope.your twisting what Im saying read it in plain english bro..dont try to interpret what you think Im saying

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    But your opinion is contradictory. You agree with what the Chief is saying yet you call him names.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    again, I have my opnion on the situation you have yours. thats what I will own.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    He's saying the cop didn't follow his training and broke the rules of his training which is correct. Can you not see your hypocritical double talk here? Own it bro.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Not what I said..dont put words in my mouth. I said for control of suspect reasons you shouldnt let go. I didnt agree with what chief is saying that cop was wrong and too aggressive if you will. hes saying it in that manner. Im not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    So you agree with what he's saying but he's a spineless bitch because it doesn't fit your narrative.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    I mean about the details of what he's saying. If you think about it, it makes sense. It's probably not a good practice to ever let go of someone like that.
    I agree with that for control of the suspect reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    I mean about the details of what he's saying. If you think about it, it makes sense. It's probably not a good practice to ever let go of someone like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    Rip how do you respond to the chiefs comments?
    Simple really..I lived in that area for 4 years..he was chief back then..hes trying to keep the peace..Columbia is a VERY Racial town in SC. Hes trying to avoid an uprising of the people if you will and also trying to avoid a law suit.. Hes sacrificing his officer for the "greater good" of the dept. if you will..hoping this will blow over. people are trying to make it a racial incident..which it is not. He was a spineless bitch back then and still is now. Thats why hes been in that position for so long..hes a puppet bro.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bouncer
    replied
    Rip how do you respond to the chiefs comments?

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    And you believe a white kid in Beverly hills would receive that treatment?
    I believe he would deserve no less...

    Leave a comment:


  • StanG
    replied
    The Chief's take:

    "When you make an arrest of someone who does not have a weapon, you never let go of the subject. When he threw her across the room, he let go of her. That's what violates our policy," Lott said.

    "She wasn't a danger at that point; she was just being non-compliant and disrespectful. You try to de-escalate a situation. And when you do have to put your hands on someone, there are other techniques we use."

    Food for thought.....

    Leave a comment:


  • lipripper
    replied
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    Who hates the police?
    lol..nice try B

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X