Friday the 13th Paris Mass Shootings

[Mr I]

And I don't agree with GG on some of his points otherwise but he was right here Watch "George galloway on iraq and oil for food scandal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/_5QNWmj8tBY

[Mr I]

https://www.rt.com/news/322427-anony...tter-accounts/

[Bouncer]

Hey bro do you happen to have any kkk articles on the history and good attributes of the African? Thanks.

Perspectives are shit if they aren't factual.

[Mr I]

By way of self denigration as a nation watch this. Watch "'No Al-Qaeda, Islamist fundamentalism in Iraq before Blair & Bush invasion' - Galloway to MPs" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/SH5RGkn1ylY

[Mr I]

Even that would be of interest. In terms of RT, they often have people on that wouldn't get a look in on CNN and often with very legitimate points of view.

[Bouncer]

I look forward to your links to the English speaking kim jong un news network when they come online. ;)

Personally, I wouldn't ask a retard for his opinion on global warming.. Some perspectives offer very little...

[Mr I]

It's about perspectives and understanding them. I could take apart most media sources on the basis of who they are owned by and where their allegiance lies. Instead I prefer to listen to them all but understand exactly who they are.

[Bouncer]

specifically exclude one is about as logical as only sourcing from one. It would be like forming a committee for a debate then telling a number of its members they cannot speak.

I think excluding one that is strictly prohibited from criticizing it's home nation or it's leader is a smart idea. News isn't supposed to be a debate or an opinion. It's supposed to be factual reporting about what's going on in the world.

[Mr I]

Except for the fact that I have long ago pointed out RT was government owned your point might have been news to me. As a brit I would say that the BBC is one of the least prejudice media out there but also quite basic in terms of what it says and is still evidently prejudice to a degree. I've yet to find a media source without a prejudice but to specifically exclude one is about as logical as only sourcing from one. It would be like forming a committee for a debate then telling a number of its members they cannot speak.

[Bouncer]

Mr.I you mention or link to the RT news network often. You do realize they are literally a state sponsored Russian propaganda machine right? They are so bad they make Fox News look legit. RT is strictly prohibited from ever criticizing Putin. Read up on it bro, it's pretty interesting shit actually. Full fledged state propaganda television. And before you even mention the BBC comparatively, let me just stop you and say wrong again. I will be glad to give you factual differences if you care to pull your head out of your ass long enough to give a shit.

Author Gearoid O Colmain may be an interesting watch but any interview with RT is going to be setup and edited in a way that favors the Russian state thus not giving the whole picture.

[Mr I]

Watch "Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks with RT International" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

[Bouncer]

Trump knows his audience. Scrum, he will be the next President without a doubt. Keeps himself talked about constantly. He'll be a terrible President but that's besides the point. Gotta give him credit, he does what's nessisary to win.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donal...ry?id=35244275

[Bouncer]

lol

[Bouncer]

encryption has been used for thousands of years. coded messages on scrolls etc.. the concept has been around almost as long as man.

these cock sucker politicians will use this as a means to push their anti privacy agenda and many people will go along with it in the name of being protected from evil! lol

[Scrumhalf]

BULLSHIT!!!

Nothing pisses me off more than this. Terrorists have been using encryption FOREVER!!

Read that Glenn Greenwald article I posted earlier. It shows how long intelligence have KNOWN that terrorists have used encryption..