Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Comparing the Las Vegas Attack With Daily Gun Deaths in U.S. Cities

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I also love how liberals want to ban "assault rifles". First off what makes a rifle an assault rifle?? Secondly, with all gun deaths per year in the US only 2% are related to rifles. That's all rifles not just "assault rifles". More people die from hands and feet than rifles.

    Comment


    • #17
      I think when the media says "assault" rifles they are talking about full auto rifles. The media is just as bad with steroids so it's nothing knew. They think there is just 1 steroid. Or they think GH is a steroid etc.. No different, the media has no interest in the details.

      Ripper there is a bunch of abortion nuts that hold up signs at some doctors office down the street. It's a bunch of old white fellers. I think I'll shoot em. :D

      You'd rather a 15 year old girl who got pregnant have the baby and most likely be a horrible mother thus ruining the child's life and most likely have them turn out to be another turd in the world?

      If it's early stages an abortion is just fine in cases like I laid out above. The "baby" in early stages is no more of a baby then the chicken eggs you have in your fridge. Now if the girl is past 3-4 months pregnant that's where I start coming over to your point of view.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
        I think when the media says "assault" rifles they are talking about full auto rifles. The media is just as bad with steroids so it's nothing knew. They think there is just 1 steroid. Or they think GH is a steroid etc.. No different, the media has no interest in the details.

        Ripper there is a bunch of abortion nuts that hold up signs at some doctors office down the street. It's a bunch of old white fellers. I think I'll shoot em. :D

        You'd rather a 15 year old girl who got pregnant have the baby and most likely be a horrible mother thus ruining the child's life and most likely have them turn out to be another turd in the world?

        If it's early stages an abortion is just fine in cases like I laid out above. The "baby" in early stages is no more of a baby then the chicken eggs you have in your fridge. Now if the girl is past 3-4 months pregnant that's where I start coming over to your point of view.
        Personally if they are old enough to be fucking..they should be old enough to protect them selfs..Just my opnion.:D.. My point is..dont support one form of taking lives..then say another reason (guns)lives are taken is wrong and try to out law it.

        Comment


        • #19
          Of course.. like our liberal friends want to make points that are stupid..so now I will...lets take all the money the federal government pays for abortions..now..thats killing..taking life. no way around it.

          All that money should be used for saving lives...so..every gun owner who don't kill anyone should receive a check each year from those funds.:D see...:thumup:

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by lipripper View Post
            Personally if they are old enough to be fucking..they should be old enough to protect them selfs..Just my opnion.:D.. My point is..dont support one form of taking lives..then say another reason (guns)lives are taken is wrong and try to out law it.
            I definitely understand the point. Hypocritical politicians..

            But I also know that at 15 years old I was an absolute dipshit and I would have been a horrible father. Your just a kid at 15 and you only really care about yourself. So there is a very good chance that a baby being raised by a 15 year old kid will turn out to be a piece of human trash as an adult because they were never taught the basics of being a good human. I'm not saying that is always the case, just that there is a good chance the kid grows up to be someone like traps.. and nobody wants that lets be honest. :D

            But yea, at a certain point when the baby has started to form a brain and a heart and the mother could have had the abortion well before that but was "undecided".. I'm against that and I agree with you.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by lipripper View Post
              so..every gun owner who don't kill anyone should receive a check each year from those funds.:D see...:thumup:
              And with that check we should also get clearance to buy any sort of gun we want because we have displayed our ability to be a law abiding citizen with a weapon without hurting anyone. M60's, high capacity full auto pistols etc.. :D

              Comment


              • #22
                But fully auto rifles are already illegal. Most liberals have no idea the differences between rifles. Like a semi automatic or one that requires you to manually cycle the next round (bolt action, pump, ect...). They use the term "assault rifle" based only upon the looks of the rifle.

                And as far as abortion is concerned. I currently know a couple families that would love to adopt a baby but due to the costs they are unable to. A domestic adoption in my area costs between 20K-30K. That is absurd! Make adoption more affordable and have counselors guide these young girls to give up their baby for adoption. To say it's ok to kill a baby is something I will never agree with.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
                  But fully auto rifles are already illegal. Most liberals have no idea the differences between rifles. Like a semi automatic or one that requires you to manually cycle the next round (bolt action, pump, ect...). They use the term "assault rifle" based only upon the looks of the rifle.

                  And as far as abortion is concerned. I currently know a couple families that would love to adopt a baby but due to the costs they are unable to. A domestic adoption in my area costs between 20K-30K. That is absurd! Make adoption more affordable and have counselors guide these young girls to give up their baby for adoption. To say it's ok to kill a baby is something I will never agree with.
                  Good points.

                  But do you consider the eggs you have in the fridge chicken babies? In the first month or 2 it's not a baby bro. It's just a bunch of goo. After 3 months though once it starts forming into a baby I agree with you.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                    Good points.

                    But do you consider the eggs you have in the fridge chicken babies? In the first month or 2 it's not a baby bro. It's just a bunch of goo. After 3 months though once it starts forming into a baby I agree with you.
                    No I consider them food..:D

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by lipripper View Post
                      No I consider them food..:D
                      You get my point bitch and you agree just have a hard time saying it. See i'm not left or right. I agree with the democrats when it comes to science, the environment, and education. But I agree with republicans when it comes to guns and the 2nd amendment. I also agree with Republicans on restrictions when it comes to immigrants particularly coming from Muslim countries. However I do think they are hypocrites for not adding Saudi Arabia to that list. They are the fucking worst when it comes to terrorism. But they buy tons of weapons and aircrafts from us and supply us with oil so we give them a pass.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Chadd77 View Post
                        A domestic adoption in my area costs between 20K-30K. That is absurd!
                        Chadd, do you know why it costs so much? Just curious. Is it for background checks and stuff? That's seems awfully high, no matter how you look at it.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Scrumhalf View Post
                          Chadd, do you know why it costs so much? Just curious. Is it for background checks and stuff? That's seems awfully high, no matter how you look at it.
                          The agency's are for profit. I'm sure they make a killing. I asked other parents that have been through this process that same question and they cannot tell you exactly where all the money goes. The birth mother gets some expenses paid for, paper work, lawyer, home study... I'm sure there might be more but still think 20K-30K is waaaaay too much. Even if it was $7K I know you would see more families adopt. Since my wife and I are foster parents we know a lot of families that wold prefer adoption but cannot afford the price tag.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                            You get my point bitch and you agree just have a hard time saying it. See i'm not left or right. I agree with the democrats when it comes to science, the environment, and education. But I agree with republicans when it comes to guns and the 2nd amendment. I also agree with Republicans on restrictions when it comes to immigrants particularly coming from Muslim countries. However I do think they are hypocrites for not adding Saudi Arabia to that list. They are the fucking worst when it comes to terrorism. But they buy tons of weapons and aircrafts from us and supply us with oil so we give them a pass.
                            I don't compare a chicken egg to a human.:wack: also I'm not a big anti abortion guy..or pro life guy.. I'm in the middle there actually. I don't believe the federal government should use our tax payers dollars to fund abortions because people are lazy or too fucking stupid to use prevention. In cases of rape, incest or life threating situations a decision by the mother should be made. Again..just my opinion.

                            But the hypocrisy of politicians allowing death and paying for it on one hand saying this is good...yet trying to restrict law abiding citizens of their right for "feel good" laws is what I'm talking about. Be fucking real! Take the money from abortions and use it for mental health screening and find a way for sick fucks not to have a gun. As anyone with real common sense knows banning them is never the answer. drugs are already banned,,driving drunk is banned,,robbery is banned... but its gonna still happen anyway as we all know. So for someone to sit there and say new laws will fix it....shows one of two things..of witch they will never admit.#1 they are just being political or #2 they are really stupid..its like believing...the world is flat!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              agree 100% when it comes to banning something. fun fact, during prohibition alcohol consumption actually went up in America.

                              banning weapons would simply increase the size of the firearms black market. you'd have "UG labs" open up just like with steroids and start making guns.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                The illuminati card game came out in 1996 and predicted a host of events that are more than coincidental.

                                911 for example and the pentagon.



                                Princess Diana's name in the card game was shortened to "di" and one year after thecard game came out she died.



                                The Las Vegas card has a Jack and an Ace and Jason Aldean has that Jack and Ace tattoo.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X