Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Syrian War: Trump says missiles are coming

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Syrian War: Trump says missiles are coming

    US President Donald Trump has tweeted that Russia should "get ready" for missiles to be fired at its ally Syria, in response to an alleged chemical attack near Damascus on Saturday.
    "Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and 'smart!'" Mr Trump said in his tweet.
    Senior Russian figures have threatened to meet any US strikes with a response.
    President Bashar al-Assad's government denies mounting a chemical attack on the rebel-held town of Douma.
    In one his tweets on Wednesday, Mr Trump called the Syrian leader a "gas killing animal".
    In another, he painted a dark picture of US-Russia relations but said it did not have to be that way.

    The US, UK and France have agreed to work together and are believed to be preparing for a military strike in response to the alleged chemical attack at the weekend.

    Syria 'chemical attack': What we know

    WHO demands 'chemical attack site' access

    Viewpoint: Chemical weapons ‘threat to West’

    What happened in Douma?

    Opposition activists and rescuers say government aircraft dropped bombs filled with toxic chemicals on Douma.

    [https://ichef-bbci-co-uk]

    Image captionUnverified video shows children being treated
    The Syrian-American Medical Society (Sams), which operates in rebel-held areas, and local aid workers said*more than 500 people had been treated for symptoms "indicative of exposure to a chemical agent"*.
    On Wednesday, the UN's World Health Organization demanded access to verify reports from its partners, which include Sams, that 70 people had died - including 43 who showed "symptoms consistent with exposure to highly toxic chemicals".
    A team from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is due to deploy to Syria "shortly"*to determine whether banned weapons were used.
    Douma, the last major rebel stronghold near the capital Damascus, was under renewed assault from Syrian and Russian forces last week.
    Rebels have now been evacuating the town under an agreement involving the Russian military.

    What is Russia's position?

    It has described the reports of the chemical attack as a "provocation" designed to justify Western intervention against its ally.
    It said on Wednesday that samples taken from the site had not revealed any chemical substances.
    Russia also said it would deploy military police to Douma on Thursday and that the situation there had stabilised.
    Several senior Russian figures have warned of a Russian response to a US attack, with Alexander Zasypkin, Moscow's ambassador to Lebanon, repeating on Wednesday a warning by the head of the military that missiles would be shot down and their launch sites targeted if they threatened the lives of Russian personnel.
    Also on Wednesday, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova asked whether the aim of Western strikes might be "to quickly remove the traces of the provocation... [so] international inspectors will have nothing to look for in terms of evidence".
    Addressing new ambassadors in Moscow, President Vladimir Putin said the world was becoming more chaotic. He said he hoped common sense would prevail and that the situation would stabilise.
    Mr Putin said Russia would "keep all its international obligations in full".

    What happens next?

    On Tuesday, Mr Trump cancelled his first official trip to Latin America so he could focus on Syria.
    That decision suggests the US response may involve a larger military operation than a limited strike, says the BBC's Barbara Plett Usher in Washington.
    On Wednesday, Defence Secretary James Mattis said the US was still assessing the chemical attack and that the US military stood ready "to provide military options if they are appropriate as the president determines".

    [https://ichef-bbci-co-uk]

    French President Emmanuel Macron said any strikes would "not target allies of the [Syrian] regime or attack anyone, but rather attack the regime's chemical capabilities".
    But The Times newspaper reports that the UK's Prime Minister Theresa May has urged Mr Trump to provide more evidence of the suspected chemical attack.
    A US Navy guided-missile destroyer, the USS Donald Cook, is in the Mediterranean Sea.
    There are reports that Russia has withdrawn battleships from its naval base in the Syrian port city of Tartus:

    [https://ichef-bbci-co-uk]

    [https://ichef-bbci-co-uk]

    Syria decision looms for Prime Minister May

    Russia warns US over Syria response

    What is the UN doing?

    On Tuesday the UN Security Council failed to approve moves to set up an inquiry into the alleged attack on Douma.
    As permanent members of the council, Russia and the US vetoed each other's proposals to set up independent investigations.
    The US-drafted resolution would have allowed investigators to apportion blame for the suspected attack, while Russia's version would have left that to the Security Council.
    The OPCW's fact-finding mission will not seek to establish who was responsible for the attack.


    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

  • #2
    Trumps tweet

    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

    Comment


    • #3
      That plus the missile Saudi just shot down. shit could get ugly over there again! We talked about this months ago.

      on another note..Trump is a hypocrite he busted out Obama for telling on the military..IE pulling out at such a date.. warning about strikes.. now hes doing the same shit. That's fucked up!

      Comment


      • #4
        this shit doesn't add up and the mainstream media refuses to ask a very basic question.

        we need to ask ourselves 1 simple thing... WHY? Why would Assad do this? he is winning the war against the rebels and ISIS. on top of that the trump said last week he wants to pull the US out. Then we see this, where Assad supposedly uses chemical weapons full well knowing it would bring world condemnation and pull the US back into th war. Why would Assad want to do that when he is just about to win anyway?

        The only thing that makes sense here is that someone that wants this war to continue dropped those chemical bombs to keep the war going. It sure as fuck wasn't Assad, that war is the last thing he wants at this point.

        It's important to remember that US General Mattis himself admitted that last years chemical attack where we shot a tomahawk missile into a syrian aribase was proven to be false. Mattis admitted there was zero evidence that it was Assad had used those chemical weapons. That was almost a year ago to the day.

        It's also important to remember that "WMD's" were used as a reason to invade IRAQ. There were no WMD's ever found and the US government admitted it made a mistake.

        the lesson here is this. it's easy to go to war over BS and then look back and apologize then it is to come up with legit and truthful reasons to go to war.

        http://www.newsweek.com/now-mattis-a...-people-801542

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by lipripper View Post
          on another note..Trump is a hypocrite he busted out Obama for telling on the military..IE pulling out at such a date.. warning about strikes.. now hes doing the same shit. That's fucked up!
          This is what I was just thinking about. There are also old tweets from 2013 where Trump totally contradicts himself.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
            this shit doesn't add up and the mainstream media refuses to ask a very basic question.

            we need to ask ourselves 1 simple thing... WHY? Why would Assad do this? he is winning the war against the rebels and ISIS. on top of that the trump said last week he wants to pull the US out. Then we see this, where Assad supposedly uses chemical weapons full well knowing it would bring world condemnation and pull the US back into th war. Why would Assad want to do that when he is just about to win anyway?

            The only thing that makes sense here is that someone that wants this war to continue dropped those chemical bombs to keep the war going. It sure as fuck wasn't Assad, that war is the last thing he wants at this point.

            It's important to remember that US General Mattis himself admitted that last years chemical attack where we shot a tomahawk missile into a syrian aribase was proven to be false. Mattis admitted there was zero evidence that it was Assad had used those chemical weapons. That was almost a year ago to the day.

            It's also important to remember that "WMD's" were used as a reason to invade IRAQ. There were no WMD's ever found and the US government admitted it made a mistake.

            the lesson here is this. it's easy to go to war over BS and then look back and apologize then it is to come up with legit and truthful reasons to go to war.

            Now Mattis Admits There Was No Evidence Assad Used Poison Gas on His People: Opinion
            I think the mistake you might be making with this question/assumption is that Assad is a rational thinking human being. He's a monster. He may be winning, but it's far from over and he wants it to be over and for the rebels to submit. He thought he could gas them and not get caught.

            I do agree that we need undisputable proof of this chemical attack and even then I'm not sure I'd attack. There is also a good chance the Russian's did this.

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't think so bro. Just like Kim Jung Un. People often confuse dictators for some nut who cannot think rationaly. Both leaders have proven they are actually quite cunning.

              Just think about it bro. He's got absolutely nothing to gain.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                I don't think so bro. Just like Kim Jung Un. People often confuse dictators for some nut who cannot think rationaly. Both leaders have proven they are actually quite cunning.

                Just think about it bro. He's got absolutely nothing to gain.
                You may be right.

                But, you think the US and allies want a reason to attack Syria and potentially go to war with Russia? I believe I saw France/Macron come out and condemn what happened.

                Comment


                • #9
                  https://medium.com/dfrlab/putinatwar...a-2d94ff0a018e

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Keiser View Post
                    You may be right.

                    But, you think the US and allies want a reason to attack Syria and potentially go to war with Russia? I believe I saw France/Macron come out and condemn what happened.
                    so why won't the US try and verify this? why is it a rush to respond?

                    there are rebells on the ground that DO want this war to continue. what better way to keep the war going. it's happened before bro. Gen Mattis now admits there was never any evidence that connected Assad to the last chemical attack where we hit a base with a tomahawk.

                    There is also the Israel, Iran, and Saudi element to think about.

                    let me be clear. Hassad is a POS. but that doesn't make him guilty of this particular attack. in the same way that Hussein was a POS but it didn't mean he had the WMD's we used as a reason to invade.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Macron just came out and said that France has verifiable 100% proof that Assad did this.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        https://www.theguardian.com/world/li...g-live-updates

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          What is the proof that Assad did it?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Our ally says yet have it, check that article I posted. What should we believe? Our ally or a conspiracy theory?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Keiser View Post
                              Our ally says yet have it, check that article I posted. What should we believe? Our ally or a conspiracy theory?
                              Should we have believed the WMD theory to invade iraq simply because our government said so? Should we have believed the Assad chemical attack last year even though Gen Mattis now admits there is no proof and never was?

                              It's almost as if you still believe the narrative that we are always the good guys fighting "evil".

                              In the 60's and 70's you'd have been calling me a conspiracy theorist if I had said the Veitnam narrative we are being fed isn't true.

                              This would have been counter productive to Assad's goal. He isn't a dumb man.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X