She's outraged that the state of New York has given Amazon big tax cuts. These tax cuts are incentive for amazon to build a massive "second headquarters" that will bring 25,000 jobs to the area. Without these tax cuts amazon could have easily picked another state.
Would she rather amazon not come to NY at all? Would she rather those 25k jobs go somewhere else? Is not giving amazon a tax cut more important to her then the 25k jobs it would bring?
To me her stance goes like this.. as long as the rich don't get richer she's okay with the poor getting poorer. In other words she's more anti-rich then she is pro-poor. She'd rather give the middle finger to amazon and see them go to another state then give the locals those 25k jobs...
Scrum am I wrong in how I see this? I'd like to hear your view. Why is this women so appealing to the left?
Would she rather amazon not come to NY at all? Would she rather those 25k jobs go somewhere else? Is not giving amazon a tax cut more important to her then the 25k jobs it would bring?
To me her stance goes like this.. as long as the rich don't get richer she's okay with the poor getting poorer. In other words she's more anti-rich then she is pro-poor. She'd rather give the middle finger to amazon and see them go to another state then give the locals those 25k jobs...
Scrum am I wrong in how I see this? I'd like to hear your view. Why is this women so appealing to the left?
Comment