Announcement

Collapse

Advertising Inquiries

See more
See less

Probably the worst travesty this century committed by state

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
    Agree rip in that her behavior is not acceptable. But neither is the cops. I would have escorted her out of the room in a firm way that would not have involved slamming her on the ground.
    This would be appropriate IMO.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
      I don't completely disagree with ya bro. I guess I feel he could have accomplished the same result and avoided making her a sort of mortar by simply lifting her up and carrying her out.
      watch all the videos..she was asked several times. she refused.he approached her from behind for his own safety as trained ...whe he grabbed her she resisted..he took action

      Comment


      • #48
        That would not have been a resistance to me. I would have simply out strengthed her with little effort. I guess for normal guys like you, you have to over compensate for your weakness.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
          That would not have been a resistance to me. I would have simply out strengthed her with little effort. I guess for normal guys like you, you have to over compensate for your weakness.
          LOL..she was tangled up in the desk..he had to remove her from that for his safety as well as hers to cuff her..its very apparent youve never had to handle someone with rules in place that you had to control with force..not a typical bar fight...:rofl:

          Comment


          • #50
            Let's be honest, I'd have ripped her fucken head off. But that doesn't mean I approve of such barbaric mentality.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
              Let's be honest, I'd have ripped her fucken head off. But that doesn't mean I approve of such barbaric mentality.
              see..the truth finally comes out...:thumb:

              Comment


              • #52
                Still think he hurt the cause of the police and strengthed the opposition.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                  Still think he hurt the cause of the police and strengthed the opposition.
                  maybe so..but its only because people see a poor little girl being picked on.. not the the disrespectful little selfish attitude bitch she was being :thumb:

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    No, its that a professional should carry himself by a certain moral code. By lowering that standard he poisons the reputation in the hearts and minds of the public.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      There is a standard that the police must hold themselves too regardless of the behavior of the offender. He is not measured by the same standard nor should he be. If he cannot recognize that he should not be in that profession.
                      Her behavior in no way justifies his nor should it. That is what makes him or you and i better than her. HE did not need to resort to the tactics he did to quell the situation IMO. Its a gross over reaction that he should be reprimanded for.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        You have to understand rip, the world is not the 1970's south that you grew up in. You've outlived your understanding of your surroundings.

                        To put it simply. The police swore an oath to protect and serve the public. It is rapidly becoming a war between the police and the public. This serves no one and there can be no defense for it. You have no argument here now kindly retreat or suffer defeat.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Again..everyones entitled to your thoughts..you have yours I have mine.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                            You have to understand rip, the world is not the 1970's south that you grew up in. You've outlived your understanding of your surroundings.

                            To put it simply. The police swore an oath to protect and serve the public. It is rapidly becoming a war between the police and the public. This serves no one and there can be no defense for it. You have no argument here now kindly retreat or suffer defeat.
                            yes your correct..because the morales of some people in this country dont respect whats right for the good of all..only them selves...like I said earlier..get rid of all the police...lets see who makes it in todays world..

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by lipripper View Post
                              yes your correct..because the morales of some people in this country dont respect whats right for the good of all..only them selves...like I said earlier..get rid of all the police...lets see who makes it in todays world..
                              So you believe that one should lower a standard to match the lowest level of society?

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Bouncer View Post
                                So you believe that one should lower a standard to match the lowest level of society?
                                Nope, I believe everyone should be held to the same standard.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X